Figs

Figs pc1Figs pc2

Divided back, used postcard. Postmarked May 1908, Thomasville, Alabama. Publisher:  K – Win & Co., Art Publishers, Chicago, Illinois.

Price:  $8.00

“Hello Cousin – how are you fine I hope. I am all ok. I guess you got my picture now you must send me one of yours! I am sending Sister Edna a card. She sent me one. From you loving cousin Doc Spinks   Winnie said to tell you to ans. her letter soon.”
And on the front of the card the sender wrote  “ans this card soon from your Little Cousin Doc.”

Addressed to:  “Miss Leua Hinson, #63 St. Stephens Rd., Mobile Ala”

The exact date of the postmark is hard to read but we can see that it is May 1908 and postmarked in Thomasville, Alabama. The postcard’s a beauty showing a fig tree branch with leaves and fruit, and with the caption:

“A beautiful form is better than a beautiful face:  It gives a higher pleasure than statues or pictures. It is the finest of the fine arts.”

Leua Hinson (an odd first name) wasn’t found online in general, nor specifically in the 1900 or 1910 census records for Mobile; nor was the exact address of 63 St. Stephens Rd found in either census, but the house number could have changed at some point. From there we move over to try to locate the sender’s name in records. A little difficult without a first name, however Doc is relaying a message from Winnie, so Winnie might be Winnie Spinks, found with her parents and siblings on the 1910 Federal Census in the Thomasville area, Choctaw Corner, Clarke County. Winnie has a younger brother named Daniel, so we wonder if Doc could be Daniel. Would we write nowadays and call ourselves a “little cousin?” I can’t picture it, but I’ve seen other references to “little cousins” on other old postcards, so it was not uncommon back then. Getting back to the subject of the addressee’s first name:  Maybe it’s a nickname or a misspelling of something but that third letter there does not seem to be anything other than a “u.” By the way, Doc’s handwriting is cool. Just look at that “H” ! Imagine if, first of all, we were writing, not typing or texting, and secondly, if we took the time to write like this:

H

Lastly, “Sister Edna” was researched a little, though not extensively; her last name could have been Spinks, Hinson or other, or perhaps this was her title, as in a religious order.

Source:  Year: 1910; Census Place: Choctaw Corner, Clarke, Alabama; Roll: T624_6; Page: 15B; Enumeration District: 0035; FHL microfilm: 1374019. (Ancestry.com)

Little Girl Posing On Steps

Little Girl Posing On Steps

Old photo, circa 1900 – 1914.

Price:  $5.00         Size including cardboard frame:  6 and 3/4 x 4 and 1/4″

Another unidentified photo, mounted on cardboard, this time with no mark for the photography studio, showing a cute little girl, about three or four years old, in a light-colored, high-necked dress, wearing a bow, a necklace, and with her hair styled in side ringlets. She wears dark tights and high button shoes, and is standing on the bottom step of a two-step cement stair, next to a low cement block wall, with the leaves of a palm tree and some type of wooden structure showing behind her. It looks like this may have been taken in front of someone’s house or maybe an office building or restaurant, perhaps in Florida or California. I love her direct gaze for the camera.

This photo’s date is estimated to be from about 1900 – 1914. According to numerous websites, the high button shoe style lasted until around WWI when leather was rationed, along with many other items. There is nothing written on the back except for someone’s arithmetic, and the photo and frame are not in the greatest of shape with the corner wear, the uneven sides and a couple of major creases. Ah but the rustic look is in!

Three Kids Photo Taken By The Up-To-Date Studio

Three Kids Photo Taken By The Up To Date Studio pc1Three Kids Photo Taken By The Up To Date Studio pc2

Divided back, unused, Real Photo Postcard. AZO stamp box. Photography studio:  The Up-To-Date Studio. Circa 1907 – 1918.

Price:  $8.00

Real Photo Postcard showing oval studio photo of three gorgeous children, two girls and a boy, who must surely be siblings due to their strong resemblance to one another. At the bottom right is the studio’s identifying mark that was imprinted, and shows “The Up-To-Date Studio” surrounded by a simple leaf-type design. This photography studio is not showing up online, although plenty of entries come up under “photography” and “the up-to-date studio.” The phrase must have been the buzzword of the day for studios and equipment. The AZO stamp box with all four triangles pointing upward places this postcard at about 1904 – 1918, but it has the divided back, so then presumably from about 1907 – 1918.

Golden Eagle For Hattie Patuno

Golden Eagle For Hattie Patuno pc1Golden Eagle For Hattie Patuno pc2

Divided back, embossed postcard, unused with writing. Printed in Germany. Publisher unknown. Series 1460 C.

Price:  $7.00

Beautiful postcard printed in Germany of purple flowers with green centers, an eagle in gold, with the rays of the sunrise or sunset in the background. The card is addressed to  “Hattie Patuno, Wellsburg Iowa”  and was never postmarked. And it looks like the sender’s initials are  “A. U.”  but Hattie’s name is not showing up online in Iowa or anywhere for that matter, which is unusual. But wow, the colors on this card!

Stein 4th Of July Float

Stein 4th Of July Float pc1Stein 4th Of July Float pc2

Undivided back, Real Photo Postcard. Circa 1902 – 1906.

Price:  $20.00

“Dear Uncle Walter, Your postals I received. Many thanks for same but sorry to say I lost the postal card Saturday of you. send me one again. be so kind and send Saturday again. This is our float for the 4 of July. I am the one with the head …?… turned …you[?]with love to you …?…I [?] …?…I will go to stay with Grandpa next month. Myrtle Stein”

Card addressed to:  “Mr. Walter Stein, New York City, N. Y., #104 West 100th Str.”

RPPC gem

This is a gem of a postcard from probably 1902 – 1906:   A Real Photo Postcard, from the undivided back era, showing a photo, taken during a Fourth of July parade, of the Stein family’s horse or mule-drawn float. There are lots of details to try to pick out here. We can see the Stein name on the side of the float, though the word after Stein is hard to read. You’ll notice what appear to be street signs just behind the tropical looking plant. The signs seem off-kilter so maybe they were put up for the parade. And is the plant part of the float? It’s hard to tell. One of the signs looks like it says “First National.”  Here is a cropped but not resized photo. You should be able to click twice on the image to get the best view.

Stein Float Photo

Man or bear?

Continuing on with some of the other details, there’s a lady wearing a large hat, and a gentleman with a white goatee. There are several different hat styles the men are wearing. And that looks like part of a windmill behind the wooden utility pole. There’s the star-spangled banner and oh that beautiful iron railing that the banner hangs from! On the float the man in the front wears a funny hat, and there are three girls at the back, one of whom is Myrtle, probably the one on our right, based upon what she says in her note. And what are we looking at just to the right of the man? To me it looks like a fake bear standing up, with his head looking upward and his left arm reaching up or holding onto the vertical support, and a chain or rope around his waist. My husband thinks it’s a guy in a fur coat with a belt and wearing a hat. (This is always so amusing, to wonder if what you think you see is really what you see, and if not how far off were you? You can picture yourself doing that quick heel of the hand to the forehead gesture, saying, “Ahhhh, of course, I see it now, it’s….” as you are cracking up laughing.) Come to think of it, this would be hot weather so it seems doubtful someone would be wearing a fur coat…

Railway Mail Service

Although the card is postally used, the postmark did not get fully stamped, unfortunately. What we can read of the postmark is “.& El Paso. R”  and just below that  “Tr. 9.”  (Train 9? Trolley 9?) To the right of that is a mark that should have read “RMS” which stands for Railway Mail Service and means that this postcard was processed in a mobile post office, such as a railway, or streetcar. The postal workers would have worked in a separate mail car attached to the train or on a trolley where half of the car would be for passengers and half for mail. The railway postal clerk job was dangerous, involving the possibility of train wrecks, falls, fires, robberies and derailments.

A Mystery

The addressee, Walter Stein, was not found at this address on the 1905 New York State Census or the 1900 and 1910 Federal Census for Manhattan. There are multiple entries for Myrtle Stein in various locations but no confirmation was found for this postcard. As for railway companies or lines there are at least seven that end in “& El Paso” that I’m finding in a quick search so this avenue of research is also proving to be difficult…Okay, so we have another for the Mystery category, but still, this is a great postcard. And one more note:  At first glance the photo for this postcard looks like it was glued on to the card, as there’s sort of an optical illusion effect happening on the right. But it would have been cropped and taken somewhere to have it made into a postcard, so it’s actually all one flat surface.

Source:  Smithsonian, National Postal Museum. Web. 4 Jul 2014. [http://www.postalmuseum.si.edu/exhibits/2c1_railwaymail.html]

Father, Mother And Dewey In Omaha

Father Mother And Dewey In Omaha pc1Father Mother And Dewey In Omaha pc2

Divided back, Real Photo Postcard. AZO stamp box. Circa 1917 – 1919.

Price:  $10.00  Size:  3 x 5 and 1/4″

Real Photo Postcard from the WWI era of an older couple, and a young man in U. S. Navy uniform who is holding the American flag. They are posing in front of what is probably their home or the older couple’s home. This one was not postmarked, and has identification in pencil on the back showing:  “Father and Mother and Dewey taken at Omaha.”  In very faint writing, and appearing upside down here it says,  “For Pa & Ma.”  I guess one would presume that Dewey is either the couple’s son, grandson or maybe nephew, but if he was the originator of the faint writing then he would likely be the son. This postcard was trimmed by someone, and thank goodness, does not have any of the black photo album paper glued to the back which so often ends up covering up the identifying information. The size is an uneven, approximate 3 x 5 and 1/4.”

Wow! Who would guess that there would so many Deweys showing up in Omaha, Nebraska in the U. S. Draft Registration records for WWI? There are at least 57 entries for young men with Dewey as a first name, or more commonly, as a middle name, residing in Omaha and registering for the draft. When I bought this postcard I thought there might be a possibility of tracing the people in the photo, since Dewey (so I thought) would be an uncommon name. This brings up the question of the name’s origin, and after checking online, I found a website that states Dewey (Dewydd) is the Welsh form of David. Interesting! And though WWI ended on November 11, 1918, one can well imagine that this photo could also have been taken after the war ended, maybe on the Fourth of July, the following year.

Source:  http://www.behindthename.com/name/dewey

I Think It Great

I Think It Great pc1I Think It Great pc2

Divided back, unused postcard. Publisher unknown. Series 852. Made in the U.S.A. Circa 1918.

Price:  $10.00

Cute postcard circa 1918 (another example of this same postcard shows up elsewhere online with this date) showing a boy and girl, the smiling moon, and the caption,  “I think it great spoon by the light of the moon.”  This is signed by the artist Witt, and one of at least several of series 852 showing a similar theme. See the prior post for the other one (so far) that we have on this website. The fact that there is incorrect grammar in the caption is interesting. At least I presume it is incorrect. I don’t see any other phrases that start off this way. It looks like there wasn’t quite enough room to fit a correctly worded phrase next to the illustration, so the phrase needed to be altered slightly. The effect is rather unique I think, and adds to the charm. But who was this artist who signed his or her work under the single name Witt?

You’re Just My Style

Youre Just My Style pc1Youre Just My Style pc2

Divided back, unused with writing on the back. Publisher unknown. Series 852. Artist:  Witt. Circa 1918.

Price:  $10.00

There is no artist’s signature on this postcard but it seems to have been done by the person who signed his or her name Witt. The next post will show a similar card that does have the signature. This and the following are from series 852:  a series which is evidently regarding this couple with a cute caption and an animated moon in the background. There’s always a chance that more information will show up on this artist in the future, but for now it’s another for the mystery pile; and it’s also another from the Alice Ellison collection. The card was never sent, has an unused stamp, and the would-be sender wrote,  “Dear Uncle: –  I received your letter. This is fair”